The question that has been asked many times this election is are you better of than you were 4 years ago. The answer is no. However, Bush was still in office. A better question is are Americans better of then they were when Obama took office. My answer to this is, it depends. In part 1, I will mention unemployment, other economic factors, and the national debt.
Even with unemployment above 8 percent, it isn't as bad as people think. Many people start the counting at January 2009, but since Obama didn't take office until two-thirds through the month, this is inaccurate. Using the January and December unemployment rate, and going two thirds to the
January one (Obama's inauguration date is 2/3 the way between beginning of January and February) the rate rounds to 7.7%, about .4% less than it is right now. Also the president has created jobs. Using the number of jobs added before the August report, then adding the number of jobs added in this report, then subtracting the jobs lost through revisions, is 773,000. Also using the January job losses and february job losses, and going 2 thirds to the february one, when Obama took office, the US was losing about 753,000 jobs a month. In August, the economy created 96,000 jobs. 96,000 jobs created a month is still a bad number, but it is much better then when Obama took office. However, it is worth noting that this doesn't keep up with population growth of the people eligible to be in the workforce, and the only reason the unemployment rate is the same is because of people dropping out of the work force. It is also worth noting that the only president since 1961 to create fewer jobs was George W. Bush. Still, this is not as dire as many people in the media would have you to believe.
January one (Obama's inauguration date is 2/3 the way between beginning of January and February) the rate rounds to 7.7%, about .4% less than it is right now. Also the president has created jobs. Using the number of jobs added before the August report, then adding the number of jobs added in this report, then subtracting the jobs lost through revisions, is 773,000. Also using the January job losses and february job losses, and going 2 thirds to the february one, when Obama took office, the US was losing about 753,000 jobs a month. In August, the economy created 96,000 jobs. 96,000 jobs created a month is still a bad number, but it is much better then when Obama took office. However, it is worth noting that this doesn't keep up with population growth of the people eligible to be in the workforce, and the only reason the unemployment rate is the same is because of people dropping out of the work force. It is also worth noting that the only president since 1961 to create fewer jobs was George W. Bush. Still, this is not as dire as many people in the media would have you to believe.
Lastly the debt is more then $4 trillion greater then it was when Obama took office. However, much of this can be attributed to policies made under previous administrations, the economy, and an aging population. The Bush tax cuts and the wars and Iraq and Afghanistan had much to do with the rising debt. The bad economy, which caused a large decrease in revenue, was also a big factor. The baby boomers retiring has cause more people receiving Social Security and Medicare. This is not to say Obama is blameless. His stimulus laws and lack of a compromise has allowed the debt to become as large as it is. Even on that, the stimulus has helped the economy recover. According to the CBO, as of the third quarter of 2011, the Stimulus created 500,000 to 3.3 million full time jobs and was expected to create between 200,000 and 1.1 million full time jobs by the third quarter of 2012. Also Republicans also have a role (I would argue larger then the Democrats) in the lack of a budget compromise.
The question of are Americans better of than they were four years ago is a complex question. The answer for this question, at least on the economic side, is no, we are the same. However, on many of these issues, America is heading in the right direction.
Update (October 29, 2012): with an unemployment rate of 7.8% and more jobs created, and better housing numbers, the economic factors are better than they were when the post was originally created
Sources http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/07/news/economy/august-jobs-report/index.html, http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/sep/06/bill-Clinton/bill-clinton-says-democratic-presidents-top-republ/, http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000, http://money.cnn.com/news/economy/storysupplement/obama_jobs_timeline/?iid=EL, http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/household-income-is-below-recession-levels-report-says/2012/08/23/aa497460-ec80-11e1-a80b-9f898562d010_story.html, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-23/u-s-incomes-feel-more-in-recovery-sentier-says.html, http://www.conference-board.org/data/consumerconfidence.cfm, http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/24/news/economy/consumer_confidence/, http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/20/markets/markets_newyork/index.htm, www.census.gov/const/uspricemon.pd,
http://www.census.gov/construction/nrs/pdf/newressales.pdf,
http://www.census.gov/const/newressales_200902.pdf
http://data.cnbc.com/quotes/.SPX,
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3294
http://bottomline.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/20/13968386-maryland-is-the-richest-state-mississippi-is-the-poorest?lite
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/labor-dept-says-it-underestimated-job-growth-2012-09-27
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68965.html
http://www.census.gov/construction/nrs/pdf/newressales.pdf,
http://www.census.gov/const/newressales_200902.pdf
http://data.cnbc.com/quotes/.SPX,
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3294
http://bottomline.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/20/13968386-maryland-is-the-richest-state-mississippi-is-the-poorest?lite
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/labor-dept-says-it-underestimated-job-growth-2012-09-27
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68965.html
No comments:
Post a Comment